FC 27 Fans Argue Over Who Deserved to Win Glory Vote
Published 2026-09-11 · DB.Coins Blog
The Vote Is Closed, the Arguments Are Not
Destined for Glory, FC 27's first Ultimate Team promo, ran its community vote from 21st August to 10th September (early morning IST on the 11th, going by the 8 AM PT cutoff). With voting now shut, timelines on Reddit and X have flipped from "who should I vote for" to "who actually deserved to win," and the FC community is not agreeing on much.
The format itself is part of the problem. Destined for Glory isn't a simple leaderboard — it's a knockout of head-to-head duels, where fans pick one player from a pair and only the winner earns a spot in the eventual live-upgrade squad. That setup rewards raw popularity as much as footballing merit, and plenty of players have pointed that out.
The Pairings Everyone Was Fighting About
Leaked (unconfirmed) matchup lists that circulated during voting included duels like these:
| Duel | The Debate |
| Benjamin Sesko vs Alexander Isak | Rising striker hype vs proven Prem/La Liga output |
| Julian Alvarez vs Mikel Oyarzabal | World Cup pedigree vs La Liga consistency |
| Pau Cubarsi vs Marc Cucurella | Wonderkid ceiling vs established starter |
| Diani vs Thompson | Women's football duel, seen as closer than most |
None of this is confirmed as the final bracket — EA hasn't published official results yet, and the full squad only goes live when Destined for Glory launches on 25th September. Treat every name above as a rumour until EA's reveal.
Meta Stars vs Growth Potential: The Real Split
Two camps have formed, and both have a point.
- The "vote for meta" crowd argues this is Ultimate Team, not a popularity contest for its own sake — pick whoever is more useful in-game right now, since that's who you'll actually pack or trade for.
- The "vote for potential" crowd counters that live cards work best on players with room to grow. An already-elite 88+ rated star has less upgrade headroom than a breakout talent in career-best form, so backing the "smaller" name in a duel can pay off more once live upgrades start ticking.
There's a third, quieter complaint running underneath both: EA never actually promised that the players with the most votes are guaranteed a place. The final squad is described as community voting "shaping" the selection alongside EA's own editorial call — which has left a chunk of the community wondering if their votes matter as much as advertised.
What This Means for Your Coins
Nothing is confirmed until launch day, so resist the urge to pre-invest in leaked names — pairing lists have shifted before and could still be wrong. What history tells us is more useful right now:
- Early promo investment cards spike hard in the first 24-48 hours after reveal, then usually cool off once packs saturate the market.
- Live/upgradeable cards carry real risk — a poor real-world run can tank resale value fast, so don't go all-in on a single name.
- The smarter play in the days before 25th September is building liquid coin reserves rather than chasing leaks.
Our Take
Expect EA to lean toward star power for Team 1 — it's a launch promo and needs marketing pull — while saving the growth-potential picks for later Destined for Glory drops. Either way, this vote has shown EA that the community wants more transparency in how "community voted" squads actually get built.
Whichever names make the cut, you'll want coins ready to move fast on release day. DB.Coins offers safe trading that increases your coin balance, with instant delivery — Get FC Coins.