FC 27 Fans Can't Agree if Women's Cards Are Too Strong

Published 2026-10-20 · DB.Coins Blog

The debate that took over FC 27 this week

If you have spent any time in FC 27 Ultimate Team feedback threads over the last few days, you will have seen the same argument on loop: are women's cards simply too strong in the current meta?

It is not a fringe complaint any more. There are active threads on EA's own FC 27 feedback and general discussion boards — one asking EA outright to split competitive Ultimate Team into separate men's and women's environments — and a clip from a well-known FUT creator arguing the same point racked up huge numbers on X before being picked apart from both directions.

Here is what players are actually saying, and what it means for your coins.

The case that the meta is broken

The complaint from the "it's broken" side is usually about mechanics, not rosters. Players on Reddit and the EA forums are arguing that:

• Shorter, lighter profiles turn and change direction faster than the game's physicality model punishes them for, so agile cards win the first touch and the second touch
• Several high-profile women's cards picked up noticeable pace bumps in the FC 27 ratings cycle — community analysis points to Claudia Pina going from 79 Pace in FC 26 to 91 this year, and Ewa Pajor gaining around six points (these are third-party readings of the data, not EA-published changes)
• The same handful of cards keep showing up in the same meta shapes, with people reporting five or six of them squeezed into one squad game after game

That last point is probably the real driver. Repetition is what makes a meta feel oppressive, whoever the cards are.

The case that this is just FUT being FUT

The pushback is just as loud. The counter-argument runs:

• Ultimate Team has always had cheap, overpowered, agility-merchant meta cards. The profile winning games this year is "short, quick, high agility" — it has been that for most of the franchise's history
• This is a tuning problem with turning, acceleration and physicality, not a roster problem. Nerf the mechanic and the "problem cards" normalise overnight
• A fair chunk of the complaining has drifted from balance into something uglier, which has made plenty of players dig in on the other side purely out of reaction

EA has not said anything specific about FC 27 on this. The closest official line remains its long-standing framing of Ultimate Team as fantasy football — a mode where you build from any league, club or nation. Treat any talk of a split-matchmaking toggle or a dedicated women's UT as unconfirmed fan wishlisting for now.

What this means for your coins

This is where it gets practical, because the hype has a price tag attached.

Two things stand out. First, the price spread on Pajor across different trackers is enormous, which usually means a thin, volatile market rather than a settled valuation — exactly the kind of card you overpay for if you panic-buy mid-hype.

Second, and more important: anything whose value rests on a mechanic surviving a patch is a risky hold. If EA tunes agility, turning or the physicality model in a title update, the premium on these cards evaporates fast, and you are left holding a million-coin asset priced for a meta that no longer exists.

My take

Enjoy the cards if you already have them, but do not pay a 1M+ hype tax for a profile that one patch can undo. If you want to invest in the debate, invest in the fodder — Ultimate Scream is widely expected to land Friday 23 October around 10:30pm IST (leaker timing, not EA-confirmed), and a fresh promo plus Weekend League rewards flooding the market is the window where sensible buyers get paid, not the window where meta cards get cheap.

Gold meta prices have already slid hard through October, so patience has been the better trade all month.

Whichever side of the argument you land on, the squads doing the arguing all need coins behind them. DB.Coins offers safe trading that increases your coin balance, with instant delivery and support built for Indian players — Get FC Coins.